skip to content »

supraposuda.ru

Methods of validating research in complementary therapies

methods of validating research in complementary therapies-13

Conclusion: Osteopathic medical students had a positive attitude toward CAM and had high levels of self-reported CAM knowledge and use.

Detailed information on how Wiley uses cookies can be found in our Privacy Policy.To learn more or modify/prevent the use of cookies, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.Context: Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has grown into a huge health care industry in the United States, with 91.5 million people (38% of adults) using CAM in 2007.Demographic and other data were collected on student use of and recommendations for CAM modalities as well as student awareness and use of primary CAM information resources.Results: Survey respondents were 635 osteopathic medical students from 7 osteopathic medical schools and additional locations in the United States.The vision of RCCM is to promote research that will widen the availability of and access to safe and effective complementary medicine for patients within the National Health Service in the UK, to help prevent disease and improve patients' health and quality of life.

As a full or corporate member of the RCCM you will have access to our members section which includes research guides on ‘finding evidence’, ‘research methods’, ‘ethics’ and ‘funding for CAM’, ‘Information on effectiveness’.

These CAM courses were likely to give introductory information about popular CAM-related topics.

tried to determine the difference in the practice of CAM by osteopathic and allopathic primary care physicians.

They reported that osteopathic physicians were more open to CAM practices involving administration of medication and practices using procedural techniques.

Berman et al also found that osteopathic physicians had more training in such CAM practices, were more likely to consider them legitimate, and were more likely to have used them.

The validity of these investigations is limited by the lower rate of participation of osteopathic physicians (66 [8.4%] of 783 physicians) compared with allopathic physicians.